Posts: 5,150
Threads: 281
Thanks Received:
243 in 218 posts
Thanks Given: 106
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
The right-click menus are getting too long. They intimidate people. So if there were some sort of external lookup feature it would have to be part of the Object Information dialog, which already is the home for many such features, including images that you have attached, web links, notes, etc. I could do that. It also has the advantage that the Object Info is connected via all parts of the software. People have already asked for links to SIMBAD and NED there.
But that takes us a long way from a quick thumbnail.
A popup thumbnail is doabale. Cons are that it doesn't apply to everything. People image comets, minor planets, galaxies (there are well over a million in SkyTools), dark nebulae, etc. Where do we get the thumbnails and how do we select a suitable subset of objects?
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 5,150
Threads: 281
Thanks Received:
243 in 218 posts
Thanks Given: 106
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
2024-01-02, 05:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 2024-01-02, 05:51 PM by theskyhound.)
That's not all that difficult to do. There is already a way to save links. Its right there on the Links tab of the Object Info. I've never been sure why more people don't use it. I say this because when I accidentally break this feature, nobody seems to notice until I do. Maybe its just a matter of option overload. One of these days I am going to make a really good tutorial about using Attachments in SkyTools. It seems to be the last thing people learn to use, but its very powerful.
Using the API seems simple, but it might be tricky. I have had a lot of trouble with these in the past. Sometimes they won't even let an unknown software like SkyTools access it. Other times there are account issues, and in the long term, any changes they make will break the functionality, and I'll be scrambling to fix it. What it really comes down to in this case is what it actually returns. If it generates a result URL that can be opened in a browser that would be easy, but if it does something else...
Another big issue that few people think about is object designations. I have to provide something that the search will recognize. I am in the process of doing an upgrade for narrow band imaging, and in doing that I am adding the common names that are popular among narrow band imagers so that would help. I don't use Astrobin a lot, and if it is picky about what designation you are searching on, then it might turn into a lot of work to get SkyTools to be able to successfully find objects. For example, the proper terminology for Sharpless catalog objects is to write them as "Sh 2-xxx" but for some reason narrow band imagers have decided to drop the space. This is just one example of how getting good results could turn into more work than it first appears.
I will look into it further when I get the chance, to see how much work might be involved. I have a lot of projects on the table right now, first and foremost the update for narrow band imaging, which will provide emission line data for many objects that had not been available before.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound