Posts: 744
Threads: 162
Thanks Received:
0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 4
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
10
Thanks BMD
I meant to take a quick look at the twitter site out of interest, but spent over 30minutes viewing it. A very good explanation on the 'Sound" testing
Win11 Pro, 64gb ddr4 Ram, RTX 2080 Super, i7 11700K, 3 x 1920x1080 280hz Monitors.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 423
Thanks Received:
86 in 83 posts
Thanks Given: 92
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
30
Here's what JPL's Small-Body DB has about it: [attachment=2296]
Interesting that it's not valid after 21:24UT on Mar 11. When did it hit?
Phil S.
Posts: 741
Threads: 136
Thanks Received:
18 in 17 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation:
2
Best I can tell from software is 21:23:58. The last observation appears to have been at 20:59:40, so just 24 minutes and change before impact. That part of the world was cloudy and the seismic and sonic listening stations have inconclusive impact time estimates due to propagation path discrepancies.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 423
Thanks Received:
86 in 83 posts
Thanks Given: 92
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
30
It would be interesting to calculate the ephemeris using the geocentric option & the HORIZONS elements to see when the Re comes within one Re. That would indicate a collision. The MPC's NEAs at Today's Epoch didn't include 2022 EB5 in yesterday's download. Their orbital elements are for the standard epoch of 2022 Jan 21 0000 UT. When I calculated the ephemeris from Columbus using the MPC's standard epoch elements, I got a minimum Re of 4,477 km.
A very interesting event for sure. It looks like the collision occurred around that time.
Phil S.
Posts: 744
Threads: 162
Thanks Received:
0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 4
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
10
There is a fairly good dos emulator called DOSBOX that is reported to run the Dance of the planets software.
WWW.DOSBOX.COM
Win11 Pro, 64gb ddr4 Ram, RTX 2080 Super, i7 11700K, 3 x 1920x1080 280hz Monitors.
Posts: 741
Threads: 136
Thanks Received:
18 in 17 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation:
2
I tried DOSBOX a few years back but was unable to get it configured properly. Have forgotten so much since the mid 80s. LOL I can actually get Dance and MoonCalc to run in VM on my W7Pro64 machine but it was always a PIA. It was a lot of fun to create planetary collisions in Dance. I just need to acquire an old 486 laptop with DOS ;=]
Posts: 744
Threads: 162
Thanks Received:
0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 4
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
10
I remember running DOS on a 286. It was slow, but we did not know any better. I read someone was using the dancing planets on dosbox, maybe they upgraded the emulator. I am surprised there isn't a more modern replacement program for dancing planets. Perhaps you should drop subtle hints to Greg
Win11 Pro, 64gb ddr4 Ram, RTX 2080 Super, i7 11700K, 3 x 1920x1080 280hz Monitors.
Posts: 741
Threads: 136
Thanks Received:
18 in 17 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2019
Reputation:
2
LOL! I recall spending $400 on 4 chips (4Mb) of RAM. Black gold for my DX486.
I've been dropping not so subtle "hints" since I first began using version 3. Working with the NEA near passes was a huge PIA in the beginning, learning to fetch osculating elements from Horizons. I've become very fast at doing that now. It works very well. In the beginning of my pestering Greg, I had hoped it would work differently so all the user had to do was grab an element set for the rock at whatever epoch was available and go. Have the software run the n-body calcs to get an ephemeris as does Horizons or gravity simulator specialty software. Then easily print charts. Over the years I've become clever in the use of ST and sources like Horizons and JPL, MPC, etc have become much handier.
I also pestered Arc Scientific for years to make a Windows friendly version of Dance of the Planets. Their answer - just not worth the niche buyer payload. Same as Greg's take. Maybe 14 people take advantage of the osculating element import tool.