Posts: 22
Threads: 9
Thanks Received:
0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
0
Hello
Which camera is on T68 (NM)?
Is it a ASI1600mc (like in ST4 Data) or a ASI071mc like on the description of itelescope?
Thanks
Ed
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi Ed,
This would be a question for iTelescope. Perhaps they have upgraded the camera? I have asked them several times to keep me informed when they make a change, but it never lasts for more than a couple of weeks. They have recently hired some new staff, so maybe we can get them more on board with informing me. I am happy to keep their telescope data up to date, but I don't have the time to check every telescope every few days...
If you contact them, please nicely suggest that they keep me in the loop when equipment is changed.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 22
Threads: 9
Thanks Received:
0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
0
Hi Greg
I had a contact with iTelescope, Dr. Sasse.
Result:
ZWO ASI 071MC-Pro
Sky Position angle: 95.9°
Thanks Greg
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Thanks. I have the camera set up, bit I am waiting to hear from Dr Sasse regarding the gain and offset selections they are using.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Thanks Ed. I will be uploading the new camera soon for download soon. If you didn't close the exposure calculator is was probably still using the old values. Try closing SkyTools and starting again, Does the exposure calculator show the correct gains now?
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi Ed,
Thanks for all this! He's actually waiting to hear back from me right now... I have way too much on my plate at the moment. I will get back to him asap and hopefully, with your encouragement, we can come up with a good way to keep me in the loop on these changes. Ironically, one of the things that has me behind this week is that I did an introductory talk about iTelescope for the Portland club on Monday night.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
Hi Ed,
I wanted to do some simple calibration images with T68 before I released the new version, but I ran into an issue. My definition for this scope before it moved had an autoguider. When I started my plan, it just gave an autoguider error over and over. When the next plan started (from another user) I noticed that he wasn't using the autoguider. Looking at the telescope info, it lists the autoguider as "Simulator." Do you have any idea what this is all about?
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound
Posts: 5,170
Threads: 282
Thanks Received:
245 in 219 posts
Thanks Given: 110
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation:
49
I took some images recently and am satisfied with my updates for T68. A new update to this iTelescope is now available. Note that this is T68 (NM) to differentiate it from the previous system located at SSO.
Clear skies,
Greg
Head Dude at Skyhound