2022-06-07, 10:21 PM
Thanks, BMD. That explains a lot. Now a search for 2010 CA261 at the MPC finds the object, unlike last year when the search returned 'No Match'. They must have decided that this object corresponded to 2009 WR192 & assigned that designation. As a main belt object it certainly wasn't making a close approach last summer.
2010 CA261 isn't in my MP DB containing 1.2E6 MPs, but 2009 WR192 is.
Phil S.
2010 CA261 isn't in my MP DB containing 1.2E6 MPs, but 2009 WR192 is.
Phil S.